On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Jesse Keating wrote:
again, dictating. You're saying that just because you own more than a few
packages, you're automatically lowering the quality of those packages, or you
automatically can't handle the load. This is a bad and very unfriendly
assumption to make.
+1.
The fears:
* Packages with single maintainers are more vulnerable to bitrot;
* If default policy is not multiple packagers, people might start
to feel like they're better going it alone.
The likely reality, as I see it:
* It will become obvious when a package needs additional love,
especially if we can build some simple tools: for instance, a
daily report on the 10 packages with the highest bug rates;
* People will, in general, be open to help with troublesome
packages;
* FESCO will be an effective body in arbiting any disputes.
--g
-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
