Re: Co-maintainersip policy for Fedora Packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all!

Thorsten Leemhuis schrieb:
> Fedora Extras for a long time wanted to have more than one maintainer
> per package as that has several advantages (see below). But until now we
> never had a policy how it should look like and how it those maintainers
>  should work and interact. I took some time and wrote something up.
>
> P.S.: This stuff (and some more details) can be found in the wiki at
> http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule/EncourageComaintainership

A slightly updated/enhanced version can be found in the wiki at above
URL now. Diff against previous:
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule/EncourageComaintainership?action=diff&rev2=10&rev1=8

CU
thl

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux