On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 05:30:24PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Monday 08 January 2007 17:26, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > Why not everything? All the packages in the repo are at their frozen > > version, and after that, to submit a build to the frozen package set > > it is another comand than the usual build. > > Because more often than not "My build is really important for the freeze" when > really it isn't. Every maintainer's package is the most important package > (to them). But everything will be frozen, so there cannot be more important package as you say. Or am I missing something? Maybe you are talking about update of packages. I hope, for that, that packagers are responsible enough not to need to be controlled by a release team. If some packagers submit unneeded builds that update the frozen packages, people can complain privately or on the list, or escalate the issue. But I can't see why maintainers wouldn't be responsible. -- Pat -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
