Re: Freeze for Test1 is in 2 weeks + 1 day

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 08 January 2007 15:58, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Dennis Gilmore (dennis@xxxxxxxx) said:
> > On Monday 08 January 2007 15:46, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > Dennis Gilmore (dennis@xxxxxxxx) said:
> > > > We would need to create a special build target so that we don't pull
> > > > in other packages built in the mean time.  when a package is acked 
> > > > it gets built for both the unpublished devel tree and the  published
> > > > one. packages in the unpublished tree get a .1 at the end of its
> > > > release.
> > >
> > > Why not just build for the unpublished tree, and selectively pull
> > > those into published tree when ready?
> >
> > you could  but you will possibly need to pull other packages in than the
> > ones fixing the problems. I was just thinking to minimise problems.  But
> > you also would end up replacing all of them once the freeze is done.  I
> > guess pick the lesser of two evils.
>
> Not sure why you'd need to pull in others, unless you let the buildroots
> pull from unpublished (which I don't think you want.)
>
> Bill
Plague pulls in from unpublished in the build roots.  Which is why i said what 
i initially said.

-- 
 ,-._|\    Dennis Gilmore, RHCE
/Aussie\   Proud Australian
\_.--._/   | Aurora | Fedora |
      v    

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux