On Monday 08 January 2007 15:58, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Dennis Gilmore (dennis@xxxxxxxx) said: > > On Monday 08 January 2007 15:46, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > Dennis Gilmore (dennis@xxxxxxxx) said: > > > > We would need to create a special build target so that we don't pull > > > > in other packages built in the mean time. when a package is acked > > > > it gets built for both the unpublished devel tree and the published > > > > one. packages in the unpublished tree get a .1 at the end of its > > > > release. > > > > > > Why not just build for the unpublished tree, and selectively pull > > > those into published tree when ready? > > > > you could but you will possibly need to pull other packages in than the > > ones fixing the problems. I was just thinking to minimise problems. But > > you also would end up replacing all of them once the freeze is done. I > > guess pick the lesser of two evils. > > Not sure why you'd need to pull in others, unless you let the buildroots > pull from unpublished (which I don't think you want.) > > Bill Plague pulls in from unpublished in the build roots. Which is why i said what i initially said. -- ,-._|\ Dennis Gilmore, RHCE /Aussie\ Proud Australian \_.--._/ | Aurora | Fedora | v -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
