On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:32:35 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 06:03:30PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 11:44:15 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > > > > > The packaging policy does evolve, and will continue to evolve, and > > > > > I do my best to adhere to the stated guidance. If I'm not reading > > > > > over the guidelines as I do any reviews, I'm garunteed to miss a > > > > > policy change. > > > > > > > > > Right now I spend too much time reading over all the guidance > > > > > looking for changes everytime I do a review. > > > > > > > > The scenario you describe is unacceptable. > > > > > > Only because you trimmed the part where Jeff is asking for keeping a > > > checklist up2date with change dates attached to the items :) > > > > "Unacceptable" = having to revisit the Wiki pages and their > > changelogs frequently in search of any important updates that have > > not been announced in proper communication channels. > > Os simply checking the date field in Jeff's proposal ... > > Please check Jeff's full post again. ??? I'm aware of that proposal. Actually, I wholeheartedly agree with his proposal. Please read the quotes again. :) -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
