On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 03:00:02PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > The decision went towards a proposed new rule: "the reviewer has to at > least mention that he checked the license, if the sources match upstream > and 5 other points he checked when approving a package". Dgilmore will I think that a mention of the license check, and of the upstream source match (with a md5sum if possible or a comment if things are non standard) should be mandatory, but nothing more. For simple review other checks are not really usefull, so mandating them isn't a good idea in my opinion. Adding all the points that were checked should be encouraged, though, it helps in my opinion. -- Pat -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
