On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 13:46 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 12:19 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> FYI, > >> The packaging committee passed a new guidelines wrt icon cache scriptlets: > >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets/iconcache > >> (pending FESCo/Core-cabal ratification). > >> > >> In short, replace existing scriptlets > >> touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : > >> %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : > >> with > >> %{_bindir}/xdg-icon-resource forceupdate --theme hicolor || : > > > It is interesting to note that this proposal doesn't actually address > > the one problem that there is with the current snipplets, namely that > > we keep regenerating the cache over and over. > > True, other problems like needless cache regeneration is indeed (still) > a problem, but, afaik, no solution exists for that, yet. I have proposed a solution in the bug. But instead of working on that, people preferred to opt for the magical xdg bullet... > Main problem *this* proposal is (trying to) address: > The freedesktop.org icon spec only mandates 'touching' top-level icon > dir, but current packaging guidelines include toolkit-specific (gtk2) > cache implementation details. Removing those details without addressing > related gtk2 RFE yields stale gtk2 icon cache. Wrong. the icon cache specification is part of the icon theme spec. Nothing gtk-specific in there. Would you be happy if I rename gtk-update-icon-cache to update-icon-cache ? Matthias -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
