Christopher Stone wrote:
On 19 Dec 2006 13:04:03 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
few places. There was discussion about how long to keep Provides: for
the old package name, and the decision was made that this should be
done for two releases. The draft was approved with those changes.
Shouldn't it just be 1 release? We do not encourage upgrading from
FC3 to FC5 for example...
Why dont we? The whole point of extending the updates for every release
as discussed in the Fedora Summit is for users to skip a release.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraSummit/ReleaseProcess
Rahul
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
