On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 14:02 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Rex Dieter (rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Yes, intentional. The 'touch' is not needed... that's what > > 'forceupdate' already does. > > How is replacing a call to a binary with a 837 line shell script > (that will then call the binary) an improvement? It's called abstraction and encapsulation. > What actual issues does it solve? You can exchange anything underneath/inside without having to bother users nor to touch a spec, again (provided a tool's CLI is stable). Ralf -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
