On 12/8/06, Christopher Stone <chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12/7/06, Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 16:17 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > This is just a heads up that I'm in the progress of getting python 2.5 > > staged for the development tree. At this point, I'm doing the build on > > the side and trying to get a good chunk of the Core packages rebuilt > > against it before pushing to the development tree itself. I'm still > > hoping to be able to do the actual move over either later today or > > tomorrow (depending on how fast the Core build system decides to be) > > As warned, these packages are built and are now moving over so should be > showing up in tomorrow's development push. > > I've rebuilt the majority of Core which showed up with a dep on > python[1], but I'm sure I missed something in my query. Also, there's a > healthy number of packages in Extras which will be hit by this as well. > > If anyone runs into any problems or has any questions, let me know. And > if you need a python25 package to play with while on FC6, my slightly > older packages are still available at > http://people.redhat.com/~katzj/python/fc6/. The changes from that > build are largely clean-ups and shouldn't impact any basic porting > effort. > > Jeremy > > [1] A few packages failed to rebuild for reasons unrelated to the new > version of python and I didn't dig into all of them to fix. One of my python packages is refusing to build on fc7 with the following error: error: invalid Python installation: unable to open /usr/include/python2.5/pyconfig-32.h (No such file or directory) All I'm doing is: %{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root %{buildroot} And the setup.py script is some tiny file which doesn't look like it has any checks for this. Anyone have any idea what could be going on here?
hrm, adding python-devel to the BR was needed to fix this. I was under the impressions that as of FC5 one no longer needed to do this? My package built fine with FC5 and FC6 without having python-devel in the BR, why is it needed now? -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
