On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 09:47 +0100, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote: > On 11/3/06, Ray Strode <rstrode@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > So Matthias was looking over a yelp bug when we noticed that some X man > > pages were getting installed in /usr/share/man/man3 instead of > > /usr/share/man/man3x despite having the .3x extension. What makes you think this is a bug? AFAICT, neither the FHS, the GNU standards or the LSB mandate man3x/ nor do they even mention it. If yelp can't handle *.3x manpages in man3/, yelp is broken. Ralf -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
