Re: dist-hg proof-of-concept ready for use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 13 November 2006 23:35, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
> Is it completely insane to consider multiple distributed version control
> systems -- choosing the systems that most closely correspond to their
> upstream projects?
>
> I mean, if we're going to be writing dist-hg, dist-git, and dist-bzr
> anyway...

Yes.  I think that adds nothing but confusion for package maintainers who make 
take over a package or a release branch of a package.  Not only that but 
having multiple SCMs used at once with a build system leads to some 'fun' as 
well.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgplmFbXva37U.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux