Re: dist-hg proof-of-concept ready for use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 03:40:20PM +0100, Denis Leroy wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
> >If all other things were equal (although they're not), being written in 
> >python is worth +1.
> 
> to me that's a big -1.. my concerns would be mainly performance 
> scalability, and code quality.

And being written in C, of course CVS had none of these problems? Lets
just leave these pointless language religous wars out of this discussion
& focus on the evaluation of SCMs based on how well they actually address
the real world needs of Fedora.

Dan.
-- 
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=| 

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux