Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sunday 12 November 2006 18:59, Christopher Blizzard wrote:
I talked with Vlad over at Mozilla about hg vs git. They are probably
going to go with hg because the performance difference between the two
on windows is just stunning, even though hg is written in python. hg
also has a single .exe installer and is easier to get up and running.
Thanks Chris. And before anybody barks about Fedora not caring about our
package scm on Windows, we actually do, as a lot of our translators are on
Windows based systems and we'd like to make it easier for them to get
translations into package builds.
I was also talking to Dan about this tonight. He likes git more because
it apparently has better merge behaviour? I guess the version they were
using before would just dump stack traces when there were problems. I
would love to hear more real-world data like that.
On that note, it would be good if tools like translations really did
work well on windows. What tools do people use today?
--Chris
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
