Karen Pease wrote: >> I would define it by a simple negated definition: >> "OSS packages which fit into Fedora's criteria, except that they do NOT >> fit into the OSI definition of "free SW"." > > Would this repo allow in packages for games developed on the "Quake" model -- > an OSS license for the code, but models and artworks under a license that > prohibits use in other projects? > If "prohibits use in other projects" is the only use and distribution restriction and we are talking about content not code, then its even ok for FE, we already have a few examples of these. Regards, Hans -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
