On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 16:29 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Moving discussion to Fedora Maintainers to bring in core development. [snip] > > If libpython2.4.so.1.0 i386 (!) is not in Rawhide x86_64, we need to talk > > about it and either start black-listing i386 Extras packages, which we > > don't want to have multi-lib enabled (or fix the sub-packages). > > > > Above are dependencies of: [snip] > So, are the above packages in error, or do we need to get i386 > libpython2.4.so into the x86_64 tree? I'll get python split up in a way that makes it reasonable to have multilib libpython after getting python 2.5 into rawhide. Note that this doesn't mean that all modules will be available for both libpython's (or that there will be two interpreters) Jeremy -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
