Axel Thimm wrote: > Thanks, Christopher, for ending this. To lighten our moods we can > start looking forward to FC6. > Hooray for Axel and Chris (or Chris and Axel) for ending this! Now with that said. Axel I do hope you take a serious look at the questions Chris filed through bugzilla, I know they are not really bug reports but they are valid questions to ask and I think bugzilla is a good way to track them. Also with the help offered by others to take a look at this, I think most differences between FE and atrpms can be resolved, for example I've already received a useful bugreport against aalib to enhance it with ncurses support, once that is done the 2 packages are identical and hopefully the atrpms package can be dropped. Assuming that atrpms for newer Fedora Releases is intended as a repo to be used in conjunction with FC+FE and not just FC. Thanks & Regards, Hans -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
