>>>>> "PD" == Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> writes: PD> After some thinking and looking at some packages, I came to the PD> conclusion that having upstream as primary maintainer in fedora PD> should be avoided if possible. I think you've made a distinction between "primary" and other maintainers that does not exist. All maintainers get access. Does it really matter who submits the package for review, or which addresses appear where in owners.list? Does the new package database even attempt to prioritize owners? - J< -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
