-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Jose Pedro Oliveira a écrit : > >> Fedora Extras development CPAN >> Older Newer >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> Font-TTF-0.40.0 (Font-TTF-0.40.tar.gz) >> <nicolas_mailhot_laposte_net> > > Methinks your version parser needs a little more work… Yes it needs (there are too many exceptions to handle). But I see this case as a packaging bug: I fail to understand why you had to append an extra ".0" to the upstream version number. I already have in my blacklist other examples of "creative" packaging version number conversions. For example: * Smart-Comments-v1.0.2 -> perl-Smart-Comments-1.000002-1 (same thing for Module-Starter-PBP-v0.0.3) I'm ok with removing the 'v' character but I'm not ok with the version number expansion from 1.0.2 to 1.000002. This kind of version number expansion is only valid for the main perl package but not for CPAN modules. jpo - -- José Pedro Oliveira * mailto: jpo@xxxxxxxxxxxx * http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo * * gpg fingerprint = F9B6 8D87 859D 1C94 48F0 84C0 9749 9EB5 91BD 851B * -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFDS4Il0metZG9hRsRAn43AJ40vgkdpYj/OrF7EXth5P2pb0eSzQCgpjt5 G7UYeAxlQDGdYob5sLa6pyA= =uWoX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
