Re: Free Software audit update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 17:37 +1200, Michael J. Knox wrote:
> Peter Gordon wrote:
> > Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> Face it - RH is not alone on this planet, their "religion" is not the
> >> only "belief" and you can't force everybody to YOUR belief.
> > Ralf: No one is forcing you to stay within the confines of Fedora's strict
> > licensing policies. You could always maintain your own local copy of the
> > package or grab it from an alternative repository, for example.
> 
> This is what I do myself for packages that do not fall with Fedora's 
> legal guidelines. Works well :)
That's what I'll do, but Pertusus' packaging of lesstif is such kind of
bad, this won't be easy, in this particular case.

More generally speaking, the fact people have to build packages on their
own at all, simply means "Fedora doesn't fit into their needs". As I
said earlier in this thread, initially I had been hoping "Fedora would
evolve into a better distro better meeting my demands" ... now I am
facing the contrary. Fedora is regressing.

Ralf


--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux