Re: Free Software audit update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andreas Thienemann (andreas@xxxxxxxxx) said: 
> >THE KNOWNS (2):
> >Packages with non-free licenses that need to be taken out of Fedora Core
> >and moved to Fedora Extras (or trashed entirely)
> >#######################################################################
> >PACKAGE NAME       || RPM provided license || Notes
> >#######################################################################
> >cleanfeed          || distributable        || Bugzilla 203195
> I'd take cleanfeed, if it is moved to extras.
> 
> However, a friend of mine has been working on cleanfeed-ng for some time 
> now, a complete rewrite, fixing many bugs and adding some features.
> 
> I'll see if it is release-fit.

I really don't see a need for cleenfeed to stay in Core (or inn, for that
matter...) But the license issue needs to be fixed regardless.

Bill

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux