Bill Nottingham (notting@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > Matthew Miller (mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 06:16:37PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Red Hat > > > Linux was a Red Hat product, sold and supported; if we're going to close > > > out bugs in that, we should really point to the official Red Hat, um, > > > 'descendants.' > > > > Yeah, but ignoring the business side (which I recognize as an important > > side), CentOS is often the best choice for many people stuck on RHL 9 or > > 7.3. And my goal is really to do the best thing for the people who went to > > all the trouble to report a bug. > > Yeah, but really, these could very well be bugs from people who paid Red > Hat money. The more I think about it, I feel it's best that someone from > Red Hat take the task to do this, as it's really our responsiblity. > > Heck, I'll do it, but it may not be tonight. Starting now. Wheee. Bill -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
