Anthony Green wrote: > This web page... > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RPMGroups > > ...indicates that a Group value of Development/Libraries/Java is > OK for Fedora. This is what the JPackage project is using. For > the few packages I've migrated from JPackage to Extras, I've > changed Group to simply Development/Libraries although I would > have preferred Development/Libraries/Java. Is it really ok to > use Development/Libraries/Java? Language isn't really relevant for the group field: it's there to tell you what something _is_, not what it's written in. Take tomcat, for example: its group is "Networking/Daemons", putting it in the same group as httpd and zope. Having seperate "Networking/Daemons/Java", "Networking/Daemons/C" and "Networking/Daemons/Python" groups for tomcat, httpd and zope wouldn't really add anything to the user's experience. Cheers, Gary -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
