Re: Core Packages in Violation of the Fedora Naming Guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 16:58 -0400, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Is there any _constructive_ way to resolve this issue?
> 
> There is a clear distinction between the Java stack and ordinary 
> packages, like two levels of upstream, Java-specific develper 
> communities characteristics, etc.  What about proposing making Gary 
> Benson's description of the Java packages tagging official for Java 
> packages, as it has already been used for Fc3 and FC4 

Could you send a link to Gary Benson's description please?  Then we'll
be able to comment on the rules the java package naming is following
currently, rather than just seeing how it deviates from the rest of the
distribution.

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux