Le mercredi 12 juillet 2006 à 16:03 -0400, Jesse Keating a écrit : > On Wednesday 12 July 2006 15:52, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > If you move it to the version you're breaking jpp -> fc upgrade paths > > If you put it as Provides it's ok from the package manager POW but not > > for users (there are reasons why we use long descriptive filenames and > > not DOS-like 8:3 names) > > In which ways are we breaking it? jpp has foo-2.6.0-6jpp. Fedora has > foo-2.6.0.6jpp-1.fc6. 2.6.0.6 is rpmnewer than 2.6.0-6, upgrade path exists. But not it the right direction -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
