Le mercredi 12 juillet 2006 à 21:44 +0200, Michael Schwendt a écrit :
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:30:42 +0200 (CEST), Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> >
> > Le Mer 12 juillet 2006 12:45, Michael Schwendt a écrit :
> >
> > > %{?dist} is a variable, giving the false impression that the source
> > > package may be valid for arbitrary dist releases and that filling it in
> > > would be enough and that no other package updates are required. Even
> > > worse, the dist tag enters the file names of the built packages.
> >
> > If you know your package will break on another release because foo package
> > was updated and changed its behaviour, you should require or BR foo with
> > the right version
>
> Who said there exists such a dependency or BR?
If you know it will break with some other FC/FE version there is such a
dependency or BR
If you don't know it will break, restricting the package in any way is
100% useless silliness
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
