Re: Core Packages in Violation of the Fedora Naming Guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 09:29 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> [blah-1.fc3.1]
> NM> It was never proper and never made it to the official naming
> NM> guidelines
> 
> Then someone needs to provide a way to bump the FC3 build of a package
> without forcing version bumps for FC4, FC5, FC6, etc.  You've just
> shot down the only thing that could possibly allow that.

It is worth noting that right now, there is no documented way of doing
this. It also stands to reason that this is something the Fedora
Packaging Committee should try to resolve. I've put it on the agenda to
discuss this week.

~spot
-- 
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Technical Team Lead || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux