Re: Core Packages in Violation of the Fedora Naming Guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:


Le Mer 12 juillet 2006 14:11, Florian La Roche a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 08:08:12AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 08:04, Florian La Roche wrote:
I think we should not set dist for the -devel branch and only add
this once a release is done and we build update packages.

That won't work.

foo-2.3-4%{?dist} for fc5 would become foo-2.3-4.fc5 and for devel it
would be
foo-2.3-4.  Now you have an fc5 package that is rpmnewer than the devel
package.  -EBROKENUPGRADEPATH :/

But you first have to add a patch and increase the number if you build
a package for the updates, so this should really work nicely.

You can probably have devel = fcn.50, test 1 fcn.90, release = fcn+1 if
you really want it

That's approximately what Axel had proposed awhile back.

-- Rex


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux