On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 01:30:42PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > %{?dist} is a variable, giving the false impression that the source > > package may be valid for arbitrary dist releases and that filling it in > > would be enough and that no other package updates are required. Even > > worse, the dist tag enters the file names of the built packages. > If you know your package will break on another release because foo package > was updated and changed its behaviour, you should require or BR foo with > the right version But isn't it more convenient to then have the one that is designed to work on that dist to say so? -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>