Re: Core Packages in Violation of the Fedora Naming Guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le mardi 11 juillet 2006 à 18:56 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway a écrit :

> Fixed: adaptx-0.9.6-2.src.rpm
> Fixed (with dist tag): adaptx-0.9.6-2.fc6.src.rpm

Actually all the java packages need some sort of alphatag-like
convention to indicate what JPackage package they're derived from. I
agree the current convention of the Java team is rather ugly, but the
reasons it's there are real reasons.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux