On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 16:40 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 17:23 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > Due to a desire to integrate the DT_GNU_HASH changes for binutils and > > glibc (which provide an ~ 50% speedup for dynamic linking) and the > > necessity of doing a rebuild for these changes, we are going to slip the > > freeze for FC6 test2 by one week. The new freeze date will be > > Wednesday, 19 July 2006. This should also allow a few other things that > > are straggling time to be tested a little bit more in time for the > > feature freeze at test2. > > Is it worth respinning Extras to pick up this performance speedup for > test2? Or is it pain enough just getting Extras respun for release? There's already been the start of discussion around an Extras rebuild before final... the main reason we pick test2 as a stake in the ground for Core is just due to how Core is tested and released being somewhat different from the rolling nature of Extras. Jeremy
