Re: ambiguity in the guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le jeudi 06 juillet 2006 à 11:26 -0400, Jesse Keating a écrit :

> I'm pretty sure we can agree to disagree on this matter.
> 
> I'm more in favor of keeping the RULES simple so that the barrier to packaging 
> is low, and leave silly little things that don't _really_ matter up to the 
> packager.

The rules can be draconian or fuzzy.
Does not matter
What matters they are clearly documented.

So my position is : if you manage to express a rule in a document that
is easy to parse by contributors, and if the rule is semi-sane, it's in

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux