On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 09:18 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Thursday 06 July 2006 09:06, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Actually, the requirement for _all_ Core packages to support IPv6 isn't > > my idea -- it's coming from elsewhere. IPv6 is an increasingly common > > requirement these days -- and when I say 'requirement', I mean that a > > product can't be considered for use unless it fully supports IPv6. > > Just to back David up on this, I'd like to point people to a recent slashdot > article (there's other articles, too. But people here should be familiar with > slashdot): > > http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/06/22/1746243&from=rss > > Just in case you don't want to read it, it says the US govt will adopt IPv6 in > 2008. IPv6 readiness should be viewed as a preliminary step to make sure we > aren't disqualified when this goes into effect. that's a good thing for RHEL... that doesn't mean it's relevant for Fedora Extras.....
