On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 14:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 00:02 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > Now if dwmw2 wants to force all Core packages to support IPv6, that's fine > > > with me. > > > > dwmw2 needs IPv6 for OLPC > > Actually, the requirement for _all_ Core packages to support IPv6 isn't > my idea -- it's coming from elsewhere. IPv6 is an increasingly common > requirement these days -- and when I say 'requirement', I mean that a > product can't be considered for use unless it fully supports IPv6. And if a package in Core doesn't support IPv6 what happens? Does it get thrown out of Core (and by the proposed standards Extras as well)? josh