Re: ambiguity in the guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 05 July 2006 16:13, seth vidal wrote:
>  I'd love to hear more comments on this
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197699
>
>
> I've read the guidelines and I don't see where it mandates the format of
> the changelog lines.

After reading all the comments, my opinion is

A) Changelog format should not be a MUST, we could allow for some flexibility 
in the packager.

B) There could be a generic 'The changelog SHOULD have the version-release 
noted in it somewhere' rule, where that version-release winds up is up to the 
packager, and its a should rather than a Must.  Reviews shouldn't be blocked 
because of this, its just a suggested practice.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpg5PZiklnGP.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux