On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 18:58 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > We understand your point that it is redundant information, but I think > the better solution is to provide a source patch to fix rpm, or file a > bug against rpm and place the extra information in the changelog in > the meantime. I never said it was redundant info. I said it was in the wrong place, in an overloaded field. -sv
