On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 20:37 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 07:40 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > > Keep in mind the "MUST" proposal is only to *document* (via bugzilla) > > IPv6 deficiency. Personally, I consider this a good thing. > > Me too, but mileages vary. These things do put some additional burden > on packagers and reviewers, but I think the situation is similar as with > let's say x86_64 not too long ago; there were similar objections and > concerns but I think eventually things worked out pretty well. except the onus of explaining what was broken was not on the packager. -sv
