> Further: A basic security check would mean that each packager and the > reviewer must understand and know the programming language the software > he packages is written in. actually only a reviewer.... well depends on what you want; a general "this looks sane enough" is different from a detailed audit. > It seems to me that a lot of people often forget that. But does that > mean that I (and all the other non-programmers) should stop contributing > to Extras? absolutely not!
