On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 19:59 -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> This seems to be a quite sane policy to have IMHO. What can we do to
> enforce this at the brew level?
There are a few ways, I can draft up some post build tests that look for
"FC[456]" or the like. However what I'm going to do instead is add
support for %{?dist} within brew, use ls and grep to find offending
packages, and file bugs with the packager to convert it to using
%{?dist} to signify things. It'll just be fun to figure out upgrade
paths and the such.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
