On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 18:19 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 14:23 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > What does this mean to you as a package maintainer? In a lot of cases, > > hopefully nothing. But there are cases where header files included in > > packages are generated at build-time and have an architecture or build > > specific nature. These conflicts will need to be fixed similar to how > > things have been fixed for runtime library issues -- either moving files > > around or removing the cause for the difference. If there is a valid > > reason for them to be different, then you might want to explore having a > > common stub header that includes the different headers as appropriate > > (eg, how /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h is handled) [snip] > I'll work on making the full output with the exact conflicts in each > package available later tonight but wanted to get info out about which > packages were problematic. Also, I plan to start filing bugs on > packages which haven't been fixed on May 16th. I've now gone and filed a ton of bugs about this and made them all block https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192658 Note that these need to be fixed in advance of the FC6 test1 freeze (which is currently scheduled for June 7th). Jeremy
