On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 05:35:45PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:29:36PM +0200, Florian La Roche wrote: > > another good test would be to check the dependencies (Provides:/Requires:) > > of the new rpm packages against the existing packages. Some packages > > might still compile, but have less complete content if we move to the > > smaller mock buildroots compared to the more complete buildroots we use > > right now. > > rpmdiff does this: > > rpmdiff libacl-2.2.34-1.2.x86_64.rpm > added REQUIRES libacl.so.1()(64bit) > > rpmdiff jpilot-0.99.8-5.x86_64.rpm > removed REQUIRES libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) > > I'd be worried most about these that are removed... > > Here's a list by package name for things added or removed. > http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mock-results/rpmdiff-added-or-removed.log Ok, the data is all available in the above url and seems quite a few BuildRequires: are missing. (By the way: a similar check can be done to use a "everything" buildroot and check what additional libs get picked up by configure-scripts. Usually we only have very few packages showing any difference.) > > It's 217K, so I won't attach it here, but it looks like the below list... Good list to find missing BuildRequires: regards, Florian La Roche
