Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Tom Lane (tgl@xxxxxxxxxx) said: >> (1) How many upstream projects will take back changes to make their >> foo-config scripts depend on pkgconfig? I'm afraid this proposed >> solution will mean we end up maintaining many local forks of foo-config. > How many upstream projects will take back changes to make their FOO work > with PAM? "work with" is one thing, "depend on" is something very different. Especially for something that is (IIUC) both a build and a run time dependency. I don't think this analogy holds water. regards, tom lane
