On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 11:10 +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 02:23:48PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > What does this mean to you as a package maintainer? In a lot of cases, > > hopefully nothing. But there are cases where header files included in > > packages are generated at build-time and have an architecture or build > > specific nature. These conflicts will need to be fixed similar to how > > things have been fixed for runtime library issues -- either moving files > > around or removing the cause for the difference. If there is a valid > > reason for them to be different, then you might want to explore having a > > common stub header that includes the different headers as appropriate > > (eg, how /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h is handled) > > Nobody has come up with a feasible plan for dealing with > %{_bindir}/foo-config scripts AFAIK. Probably the best thing to do in these cases is to create pkgconfig .pc files and then make the foo-config script a simple wrapper around pkgconfig. Jeremy