On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 11:28 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 11:21 -0400, Peter Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 00:33 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > > Do Core package maintainers accept the current FE packaging guidelines? Or > > > will reviews result in lengthy discussions about personal preferences? > > > > Obviously, there will always be some contention. This isn't just due to > > personal egos; > > A Huge amount of the bullshit has been b/c of egos, though. > That's what I've noticed so far also, which really makes me unmotivated to look at these packages. /B -- Brian Pepple <bdpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
