Bill Nottingham wrote :
> Jesse Keating (jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
> > On Wednesday 05 April 2006 11:43, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > > I don't see them imported into Extras, not to mention going through
> > > review and actually built. Sure, it's rawhide and I couldn't personally
> > > care less which way it breaks but...
> >
> > These were checked for deps (or so I was told) and where safe to remove.
> > Those things that still had deps were not removed, like gtk/glib.
>
> Right, I checked these for deps outside of themselves. If I messed
> it up, please let me know.
Well, so you know :-)
package: diradmin - 1.7.1-4.fc5.i386 from fedora-extras-development-i386
unresolved deps:
libgnomeui.so.32
libart_lgpl.so.2
libgnome.so.32
libgnomesupport.so.0
package: Gtk-Perl - 0.7008-40.fc5.i386 from fedora-extras-development-i386
unresolved deps:
libgnomeui.so.32
libgnome.so.32
libart_lgpl.so.2
libglade.so.0
libgtkxmhtml.so.1
libgnomesupport.so.0
libzvt.so.2
package: gtktalog - 1.0.4-7.fc5.i386 from fedora-extras-development-i386
unresolved deps:
libgnomeui.so.32
libgnome.so.32
libart_lgpl.so.2
libgnomesupport.so.0
gnome-libs >= 0:1.2
And the same for x86_64 and ppc. Brought to you by Michael Schwendt's neat
automated dependency check.
As for gnome-libs, it needs at least this fixed before getting into
Extras :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184125
Matthias
--
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux) - Linux kernel 2.6.16-1.2080_FC5
Load : 0.85 0.52 0.57
