On Wednesday 05 April 2006 15:42, David Woodhouse wrote: > Then let's just drop the word 'happily' and make it a declaration: > > When packages are moved from Core to Extras, the existing Core > maintainer shall continue to own the package. They can attempt to find a > new victim^Wvolunteer to maintain the package later if they so desire. The point here is different from last time. The problem that we had last time was that lots of packages in Core are not up to Extras standards. That was the reason to stop the direct injection of packages dropped from Core. But as I said before those packages did not had a maintainer. I am not against a change, but there (valid) reasons before to have such a policy. Just my 0.02 €. -- José Abílio
