Re: Networking and the firewall (Was Re: Isn't it time for the encrypted file system???)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 12:55:22PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> Indeed, the whole idea of using polkit-su have been abandoned after
> discussion on on the hal list when someone from SUN and SUSE proposed a
> better approach. Isn't open development great?

Yes. :)

> However, it's all work in progress at the point and since it's rather
> complex and deals with privilege escalation I've started writing a spec
> how all this is supposed to work. I'm not done yet with the spec.. but
> this is how far I've got
>  http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/*checkout*/hal/PolicyKit/doc/spec/polkit-spec.html

Okay, so no switching users at all. That looks pretty cool. I see "For
details (like what user to authenticate as) see XXX" -- it'd make me very
happy if XXX could include things like "for members of a given group, allow
auth-as-self" (as consolehelper currently does).


> and I hope at least the diagram explains what the point is. I do expect
> this to be baked at some point rather soon as it's holding back hal and
> gnome-mount releases :-) ... at least the difficult part of doing PAM
> over D-BUS is done and I already got proof of concept work.. so.. it's
> in a state of needing documentation of having a list of TODO's being
> worked on. If anyone wants to help out (I'm doing this mostly in my
> spare time as I'm tied up with other commitments at work) please join
> the hal list and send mail.

I'm interested but already horribly overcommitted. :)

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux