> I am also very concerned about the delay in the release of GCC-4.1 (no release > candidate yet), expecting FC5-final to include a compiler that has a wide > level of exposure to testing. Having GCC-4.1-cvs-xxx would make users > uncomfortable, and without bringing back the old RedHat ghost of gcc-2.96, I > remind you that FC4 was released with a compiler blacklisted by the KDE > project, which incidentally was one of the reasons for me and my institution > to skip FC4 altogether and stay with FC3 until FC5 is released. That doesn't show a lot of knowledge on your institutions part though ;( KDE blacklisted that gcc for ONE bug, a bug fixed in the RH rpms already.
