Re: multilib fun - devel packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Let me ask a silly question here : Why do we want to encourage people to
> build 32bit stuff on 64bit installs? As far as I'm concerned, we should
> already be trying to fix everything that made some 32bit packages get into
> 64bit installs (unfortunately, things like binary web browser plugins
> aren't helping).
> 
> IMHO, there is too much workload and complexity created by any of the
> suggestions made. Just setarch and use mach or moch. Trying to get
> multiarch devel packages is probably going to be close to
> cross-compiling... ugly hacks, hard-to-manage-long Fedora specific patches
> upstream authors won't want to include, etc.
> 
> Just my opinion, then again, I've never liked the whole multilib concept,
> and seeing it about to get worse gets me wondering some more.

+10

I completely agree. Is there a defensibly good reason why we should be
encouraging more multilib packages for fedora?

-sv



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux