Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote : > Josh Boyer wrote : > > > I was wondering if there is a license for the infrastructure code > > (Makefiles, scripts, etc) in the common directory. I believe the > > intention of the Extras project was that all of the infrastructure would > > be fully open source, however there is no explicit license statement. > > > > So my questions are: > > > > 1) Is there a license, if so what is it? > > 2) If 1 is yes, would a simply LICENSE file in the common directory > > suffice? > > > > We obviously don't package and release this stuff, so I'm just looking > > for some indication we can have to let people know if there is a license > > or not. > > Good question. We'll get an answer to you soon. Seems like the situation was taken care of but the answer wasn't posted here. Take a look at the top of the latest Makefile.common and you'll see that it's "newBSD" licensed ;-) Thanks for raising the initial concern. Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz) - Linux kernel 2.6.13-1.1526_FC4 Load : 0.06 0.27 0.35
